Yesterday, February 18, was yet another busy day at the Union Congress, where discussions continued on optimizing the time and efficiency of legislative actions. Speaker Stanisław Małachowski expressed concern about recent inefficiencies in the Congress's proceedings. Representative Jan Łuszczewski introduced a proposed new format to expedite the legislative process, suggesting a shift from processing proposals by category to a divisional approach, stirring a lively debate among the Representatives.

The day was prominently marked by eloquent speeches and calls to action as various representatives presented their perspectives on accelerating legislative work. Kazimierz Rzewuski from Podolia pointed out the eclectic nature of the presented project, while the representative from Gostynin, Walenty Rzętkowski, advocated for a delegation to refine the current law on local congresses. The sentiment for effective use of Congress's time resonated throughout the discussions.

In a pursuit to streamline operations and enhance productivity, the representatives, including Antoni Tyzenhauz from Vilnius, largely agreed upon the necessity of a swift and decisive legislative process. Remarks by Piotr Ożarowski, focused on ensuring prudent lawmaking reflective of the entire Union's will, rather than a select few, echoed across the Chamber.

The neighboring regions of Poland-Ukraine and Lithuania-Belarus were represented by voices such as Jan Nosarzewski from Ciechanów and Stanisław Gorski from Żmudź, who debated the proposed methods of expediting legislative proceedings.

As the session continued into the night, the representatives cast votes on several proposals, including one by Stanisław Sołtyk from Kraków, suggesting that proposed legislation should be printed and distributed three days in advance for consideration by the representatives. The significance of this was to provide ample time for analysis and commentary before a decision could be made.

Debate incited over whether the Constitution of 1768 should be abandoned or temporarily suspended, with some arguing for a clear abolishment and others opting for a momentary halt. The discussions highlighted the delicate balance between maintaining the Union's legislative integrity and the need for reform and efficiency.

After thorough exchanges and multiple rounds of voting, both aloud and secretly, a decision was made in favor of the Kraków representative's project. This marked a potentially transformative development for the Congress, as it sought a more streamlined and effective approach to governance.

Finally, having reached the late hours, the session adjourned until the following Monday, setting the stage for continued dialogue and decision-making aimed at benefiting the Union as a whole.

Topics: Legislative process of the Sejm; Efficiency of sessions; Bills and amendments; 1768 Sejm Proceedings Order; Deputies' proposals; Structure of deputations; Acceleration of the Sejm's work; Voting system; Establishment of the constitution; Selection of delegations and committees;