As the Congress of the Union of Poland-Ukraine and Lithuania-Belarus convened today, Speaker Stanisław Małachowski initiated proceedings by putting forth several minor legislative proposals, starting with a clerical announcement by Secretary Jan Łuszczewski. Representative Seweryn Potocki from Bracław promptly engaged with these new topics, particularly focusing on fiscal matters. Potocki called for greater transparency in the handling of public funds, suggesting that an itemized statement of all revenues and expenses should be distributed to Representatives, who could then circulate it at the local level. His suggestion resonated with the House and was met with unanimous approval.

Thereafter, the issue of the Union's budget was intensively discussed, with delegates expressing a desire for a thorough accountability to the citizens regarding expenses, including March Tax collections. The notion was met with hearty support from the Representatives, and an appeal was made to include similar accountability measures for the Lithuanian-Belarussian Treasury.

Representative Ignacy Zakrzewski from the State of Poznań brought up concerns about public awareness of government spending, underscoring the importance of transparency, which was echoed by others. A proposal regarding the update of property valuation surveys for tax purposes was read, debated, and agreed upon unanimously. The proposal stipulated that Civil-Military Commissions should undertake the surveys if initially appointed commissioners failed to do so, and the adjusted values should revert to the Treasury following the guidelines of established laws.

The session saw considerable discussion on the registration of the population, with several Representatives emphasizing the importance of accurately distinguishing various social classes within demographic data-collection schemes. The matter sparked an extensive debate about whether the nobility should be included separately in population registries or grouped with the rest of the citizenry, leading to broader reflections on equality, governance, and national security.

Some Representatives, favoring the traditional classification, argued against a segregated listing of the nobility, reasoning that since noblemen were not subject to conscription or head taxes, it would be contrary to republican spirit to list them on separate rolls. Representative Julian Niemcewicz from Latvia held that all citizens, regardless of class, should be included in population counts without fear of discrimination.

Representative Józef Mierzejewski from Podolia criticized the Treasury's insertion of this controversial topic, asserting it had already been resolved that recruitment should be based on hearths, not individual persons. Mierzejewski and others called for adherence to established methods of population listing to ensure legal integrity and avoid unnecessary delays in Defense matters.

During the session, a proposal was also made to clarify legislative language regarding the term of duty required of civil-military commissioners before they are eligible for parliamentary election, due to the forthcoming departure elections.

To conclude the day's agenda, Representative Aleksander Zieliński from the State of Nur passionately defended the need to reward an exemplary soldier, Mr. Hoszewski, for his service and bravery, demanding assurances that previously passed resolutions would be effectively enacted. He advocated that the commendation made by the States should be viewed with the highest importance, compelling a decisive action from the Defense Ministry rather than deference to individual regiment leaders. His plea received the support of the floor and the President.

The next Congress session was scheduled for Thursday, at which point the ongoing discussion regarding land grants would resume.

Topics: Marshal of the Sejm; Crown Treasury Commission; financial report; population scrutiny (lustration); military reform; donations for defense; Civil-Military Commissions; clergy rights; rittmeisters (cavalry captains); officer patents; National Cavalry; rewards and promotions for soldiers; Military Commission;