The House of Representatives is engaging in critical debates over the reinforcement and formation of our standing military forces, with discussions particularly focused on the cavalry regiments. Representative Mateusz Butrymowicz from the region of Pinsk addressed the President and the assembled body, arguing for the need to reassess the role and duties of the Nation's cavalry officers. He raised concerns about allowing officers who are already serving in high civil capacities to actively commit to military service, suggesting that doing so would undermine both the efficiency of the military establishment and intensity the disproportionate balance between civil and military power. This sentiment derives from the belief that these high-ranking civilian officers should remain part-time military figures (rotmistrze)—honorary positions—thus preserving the delicate balance between the civilian and military spheres.

Butrymowicz reminded the House of the past, where the nation's cavalry, funded by the wealthy and noble citizenry herself, played a pivotal role in protecting our territories from numerous invasions. However, by incorporating these part-time officers within the regular command hierarchy, there is a fear that the ranks and prestige of the cavalry could be devalued and might deter affluent citizens from taking up reserve military roles in the future.

During the discourse, the concept of granting traditional honorary officers the right to future military promotions was also scrutinized. Butrymowicz pointed out the problematic nature of this proposal, indicating that it fails to do justice to both, those with genuine military experience and newcomers returning from foregin service, who would otherwise be eligible for these positions.

In addition to this, a notable address came from Representative Wojciech Suchodolski suggesting that honorary officers willing to declare active military service to the defense committee should be given opportunities for future promotions based on their excellent past service records. This proposal garnered attention and acknowledgment from the House, igniting further discussion on best practices for military appointments and promotions to ensure both merit and equity.

Amidst these debates, the Congress faces a broader challenge: reconciling civilian pursuits and military duties, a critical task that will define our approach to national security and the effectiveness of our armed services.

The proceedings continue, and a resolution seems imminent with deeper implications for the roles civilians will play in our military structure and the future of our cavalry regiments.

The session adjourned with many discussions still hanging in the balance, drawing sharp focus on the critical decisions that the Congress will have to finalize in the days to come.

Reporting from the Congressional floor, this is a glimpse into the debates shaping the future of our nation's military policy and civilian engagement.

Note to readers: Stay informed and look out for subsequent reports on these ongoing significant deliberations.

Topics: Session of the Sejm of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth; Military reform; Formation of the National Cavalry; Opinions and questions of the rotmistrz (cavalry commanders); Declaration on military promotions; Polish nobility and military state; Private interests and proposals; Management and works of military commissions; Nominations and election of officers by the king; Rights and freedom of the Sejm; Discussions and postulates of the deputies; Recommendations and advancements; Consent to nominations;