Today's session kicked off with an impassioned speech by Speaker Stanisław Małachowski, suggesting that future generations would look back at these times with admiration for the progress we’re making, particularly highlighting the recent expansion of our military forces and improvements in military governance.

An intense discussion followed on the subject of the judicial system, particularly focusing on appeals and military justice. Representative Walerian Strojnowski presented amendments concerning the procedures for military courts, proposing specific days for hearings and excluding civil cases from their jurisdiction.

Representative Mateusz Butrymowicz from Lithuania-Belarus insisted that schedules be made to accommodate cases from his province, offering that when no Lithuanian-Belarussian cases were present, the Polish-Ukrainian ones could proceed.

Piotr Potocki discussed the need for clarity in distinguishing between civilian and military cases. The concerns were addressed by acknowledging existing laws and ordinations that outlined the appropriate jurisdiction.

The deliberation was paused as Representative Michał Bernowicz put forth a suggestion to simplify the process of obtaining military assistance for citizens’ legal decrees, advocating that immediate commanders be approached before the Military Commission.

Attention then shifted to the assistance of military forces in executing clerical decrees for dissidents, sparking a proposal by Prince Stanisław Jabłonowski to prevent military involvement in ecclesiastical court executions, a motion largely supported by West Poland.

In the flurry of amendments and suggestions, Speaker Stanisław Małachowski acknowledged the complex nature of the proposals and suggested postponing the session to the following day to allow for thorough consolidation and streamlining of the draft article.

As the hour grew late and the chamber filled with the anticipation of crafting concise and equitable legislation, Deputy Secretary of State for Poland-Ukraine Maciej Garnysz announced on behalf of Mister President that the session would be adjourned until 9 AM the next morning, granting lawmakers time to refine their debates into actionable policy.

That’s all from today's session, folks. Remember, these discussions aren’t just about laws; they're about shaping the future of our Union. Catch you at the next report!

Topics: Marshal of the Sejm speech; army enlargement and oversight; civil and military judiciary reforms; draft articles and amendments; National Cavalry Rotmistrzes; adjudication of military cases by the Military Commission; execution of decrees and military assistance; supremacy of the Military Commission in civil matters;

Part 2 of the Military Commission Act

In today's session of the Congress of The Union, an interesting enactment has come to the table, focussing on the integrity and conduct of the Military Commission members.

A highlight to note—every appointee to the Commission must swear an oath before Mister President and the legislative Houses of the Union before taking their seat. Those not present at the election will perform the same pledge before the established military commission.

And guys, talk about a solemn promise—it goes like this: “I vow to Almighty God in the Holy Trinity to be faithful to the President and The Union; not to engage with foreign powers or their ministers and refuse any foreign salaries by any means. I will not use the military for personal scuffles with neighbors or private needs, but will instead safeguard The Union's borders and citizens' security, ensuring it doesn't obstruct public discussions, nor will I employ it to the detriment, intimidation, or endangerment of official persons. I'll be answerable only to the President along with The Union Congress, and will oversee every financial liquidation without bias, also ensuring that military discipline is strict, adhering to the laws and military articles, and withhold citizen's imprisonment without a final court conviction.” Pretty ironclad, right?

In absence of a hetman, the most senior senator or, in their absence, the leading appointed Representative will preside over the Commission.

The Commission is set to hold regular sessions starting at 8 AM daily, aligning with their own established ordinances, relevant to the judicial cycle times outlined below.

Between us friends, this really emphasizes a commitment to transparency, accountability, and lawfulness in managing the military aspects of The Union, a refreshing approach that could stand as an example for political conduct even today.

Topics: Military Commission; oath of commission members; loyalty to the king and the Commonwealth; prohibition of relations with foreign powers and receiving foreign pensions; use of military for defense of borders and citizens' safety; commission secrecy; fairness in military accounts; adherence to law and strict military discipline; jurisdiction of the commission and judicial impartiality.;

Part 3 of the Military Commission Act

Check it out folks, the Military Commission just got a serious makeover! All the gist, they've enacted a law promising all soldiers will get the same threads, getting that 'Polish-Ukrainian flavor' into their uniforms. From grunts to the top brass, who are active duty and don't think senators or national cavalry captains get a pass here. They all have to wear the prescribed outfit.

Basically, the Military Commission will be the end-all and be-all when it comes to the overall command of our troops. They're in charge of where to station 'em and how to set up camp, and they're sticking to the rules that state Polish-Ukrainian troops stay in Poland-Ukraine, while Lithuanian-Belarussian dudes hang out in Lithuania-Belarus. Each Congress, they gotta present their grand plan for review and approval.

Let's not forget, once they park the troops, they can't just move 'em around without good reason. If a unit's sent out on a mission, they better head back home afterward, unless there's some big crisis popping up. And if things go south, like a border skirmish or some internal threats, the Commission has to hit up The President and the newly legislated lower guard, pronto.

The President, with his trusty guard, will evaluate if we need an emergency Congress, because the Union's gotta stay ready, with all states ready to huddle and tackle any issue that arises. And during those ruler-less times, two out of three states will keep things steady.

Last but not least, whenever the Military Commission hands down their decisions or reports, it's gotta have at least one civilian voice louder than a drill sergeant's. And if someone's out sick, there need to be two substitutes on standby. When it's time to vote, majority rules, but if it's a tie, the chairperson has the final say. Don't worry, everybody gets to jot down their personal take in the protocol records for posterity.

Topics: Military Commission; troop deployment; military encampment; uniform and drill; obedience in the military; reporting to the King; border management and internal security; military decision-making; commission protocol and documentation;