The debates commenced with the Speaker of the House, Mr. Stanisław Małachowski, emphasizing the necessity of mutual understanding and agreement for any societal endeavor. With Congress in session, the eyes of the nation are fixed upon them, awaiting decisions that would shape the country's future. Recognizing the gravity and the historical significance of their work, they delved straight into the agenda of military commission reports and discussions about the withdrawal of Russian troops from the nation's borders.

The esteemed Prince Józef Czartoryski, a representative from the Ukrainian territories, reiterated his previous proposal urging for a project note concerning the evacuation of Russian military forces.

The Speaker, Mr. Małachowski, remained steadfast in following procedural rules, ensuring that proper order was maintained during the discussions.

Amidst debates, concerns were raised about a communique from Russian diplomats that had remained unanswered for nine days. A sense of duty was expressed by various representatives to provide a timely and considered response to the note. Recognizing the critical importance of international relations and the sovereignty of the Union, representatives discussed the implications of the note and its consonance with the Union's contracts and guarantees.

The House was abuzz with calls for clarity and action regarding foreign policy matters, especially those related to the presence of Russian troops within the Union's borders.

In a push against encroaching foreign influence, Prince Józef Czartoryski personally presented a Project Note addressed to the Russian envoy, demanding the evacuation of Russian troops—a clear demonstration of the resolve and assertiveness emerging within the Congress.

As the conversation turned to the structure and function of the Union's military commission, various representatives voiced their concern and suggestions for ensuring accountability and optimal operation, including ideas such as rotational presidency over the commission and the omission of binding oaths in the case of illness among the military leaders.

Amid the speeches and legislative discussions, the commitment of the Union's government to safeguard its sovereignty, ensure the security of its people, and strive for a bright and stable future was palpable.

The session was adjourned by Rev. Maciej Garnysz, undersecretary to Polish-Ukrainian affairs, with the promise to resume the following day, signaling the unyielding pace and diligence of Congress in addressing the pressing matters before the nation.

Note: The specific arrangements concerning military leadership, particularly the sensitive matter of excluding military commanders from making top command decisions while sitting on the commission, proved to be a contentious issue, with various representatives chiming in on how best to handle potential health-related absences and the overall conduct expected from those in high command. The debate underscores the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth's struggle to modernize and effectively organize its military forces in the face of foreign pressure, particularly from neighboring Russia, which had significant sway over the region's politics during this tumultuous period.

For more in-depth insights and historical figures from 18th-century Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth politics, visit sejm-wielki.pl.

Topics: Great Sejm; Marshal of the Sejm Stanisław Małachowski; Opening address; Organization of the military commission; Project for the evacuation of Russian troops; Response to the Russian ambassador's note; Hetmans; Military salaries; Official oaths; Honor and integrity of the hetmans; Full assembly of sejm members; Civil status; Public treasury; Offices and institutions;